ASSEMBLY BUDGET COMMITTEE
STATEMENT TO
[Second Reprint]
SENATE, No. 3183
with committee amendments
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
DATED: JUNE 28, 2026
The Assembly Budget Committee reports favorably and with committee amendments Senate Bill No. 3183 (2R).
As amended and reported, this bill would modify various provisions of the State’s renewable energy incentive programs and require electric public utilities to interconnect certain solar projects.
Specifically, the bill would authorize, upon petition to the Board of Public Utilities (BPU), the co-location of solar facilities that are either registered, or seeking registration or participation in, the SREC-II program, including the administratively determined incentive (ADI) portion and the competitive solicitation incentive (CSI) portion, the community solar program, the remote net metering program, or any combination of those programs. As used in the bill, “co-location” means siting two or more SREC-II eligible solar facilities on the same property or on contiguous properties. The bill would also provide that certain solar facilities with a capacity of between five and 20 megawatts that are located on commercial or industrial rooftops, landfills, contaminated sites, or mining sites would be eligible for registration in the community solar program until December 31, 2028, subject to certain restrictions established in the bill. The bill would authorize the BPU to establish differentiated incentive levels for co-located projects and projects larger than five megawatts that participate in the community solar program.
The bill would provide that a project sited on a commercial or industrial rooftop, landfill, brownfield, contaminated site, or mining site that is participating in the community solar program or the remote net metering program would have no less than 33 months from the date of registration in the applicable program to achieve commercial operation.
The bill would require electric public utilities to accept, process, and respond to interconnection applications, upon receipt, for community solar or remote net metering facilities on any electric line that is sized 34.5 kilovolts or less. The bill would also provide that any electric line maintained by an electric public utility that is sized at 34.5 kilovolts or less would be classified as distribution lines, would be subject to BPU jurisdiction, and any project participating a State-sponsored solar electricity incentive program or battery energy storage program would be allowed to interconnect to the line, so long as the applicant, developer, or owner of the project pays the full cost of any required interconnection study, as well as all costs associated with the actual interconnection of the project.
The bill would amend a section of current law that provides that certain renewable energy facilities are permitted uses in municipal industrial districts, in order to reduce the acreage threshold from 20 acres to 10 acres, and to include energy storage facilities within the definition of “renewable energy facility.” The bill would also broaden this section to include commercial districts, as well as industrial districts. Similarly, the bill would amend a section of current law that provides that solar facilities sited on landfills and closed resource extraction operations are permitted uses within every municipality. The bill would broaden this section to include battery storage and other renewable energy facilities, and to extend to facilities sited on rooftops, brownfields, contaminated sites, and mining sites.
The bill would create an exemption for the purchase of remote net metering credits, similar renewable energy credits, or renewable energy production credits pursuant to a program administered by the BPU from the public bidding requirements of the "Local Public Contracts Law," P.L.1971, c.198 (C.40A:11-1 et seq.).
Finally, the bill would amend the statute establishing the State’s remote net metering program, section 6 of P.L.2018, c.17 (C.48:3-87.12), to modify the types of properties suitable to host remote net metering solar facilities, to remove brownfields and add the rooftops of industrial buildings, contaminated sites, landfills, and mining sites, subject to certain environmental restrictions involving the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP).
As amended and reported by the committee, Senate Bill No. 3183 (2R) is identical to Assembly Bill No. 3974 (1R), which was also amended and reported by the committee on this date.
COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS:
The committee amendments to the bill:
(1) add criteria that a group of solar facilities would be required to meet, in order to qualify for co-location, including that they must be being proposed for co-location because of an interconnection constraint;
(2) establish a minimum size and total amount of solar facilities located on rooftops, landfills, contaminated sites, and mining sites that may qualify for registration in the community solar program under the bill, and establish additional criteria for qualification;
(3) authorize the BPU to establish differentiated incentive levels co-located projects and projects larger than five megawatts that participate in the community solar program;
(4) remove certain references to “brownfields” in the bill;
(5) provide that a solar or photovoltaic energy facility, battery storage, or renewable energy facility constructed and operated on the site of any rooftop, would be a permitted use within every municipality, rather than commercial and industrial rooftops only;
(6) provide that remote net metered facilities would be authorized to have a maximum size of five megawatts, measured in direct current, as in current law; and
(7) make technical and clarifying changes.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Office of Legislative Services concludes that the bill would result in an annual expenditure increase by the State and local government units in the form of increased electricity costs, as the costs of solar incentives are financed through electricity rates.
The OLS does not have an informational basis on which to estimate how many solar facilities will qualify for renewable energy incentives under the bill, the value of those incentives, and the specific impact of those incentives on utility rates.
To the extent that the bill makes it easier for contacting units subject to the provisions of the “Local Public Contracts Law” to purchase certain types of renewable energy credits, these entities may experience a reduction in administrative costs associated with the public contracting process. However, these cost savings would be offset by the cost of purchasing the credits.