LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE
ASSEMBLY, No. 5337
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
222nd LEGISLATURE
DATED: JUNE 30, 2026
SUMMARY
|
Synopsis: |
Makes various changes to SHBP governance and administration. |
|
Type of Impact: |
Potential State and local government expenditure decreases and increases. |
|
Agencies Affected: |
Division of Pension and Benefits in the Department of the Treasury; certain local government employers. |
|
Office of Legislative Services Estimate |
||||
|
Fiscal Impact |
|
One-time |
Annual |
|
|
Potential State Expenditure Increase |
|
Indeterminate |
Indeterminate |
|
|
State Expenditure Decrease |
|
Minimum $1.1 million |
Minimum $870,000 |
|
|
Potential Local Expenditure Increase |
|
Indeterminate |
Indeterminate |
|
|
Local Expenditure Decrease |
|
Minimum $700,000 |
Minimum $550,000 |
|
· The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) finds that requiring the State Health Benefits Commission to establish an interactive, Internet-based price transparency dashboard that allows the commission, participating employers, and members to view the health care prices paid by the third-party administrator for health care services will result in one-time and recurring indeterminate State and local government expenditure increases stemming from third-party administrator fees and maintenance costs.
· The State and local governments will also experience one-time and recurring annual expenditure decreases due to the inclusion of out-of-State claims in the third-party medical claims review contract. The current vendor, Health Management Systems, Inc., has suggested that the State will realize a minimum of $1.1 million in one-time savings and $870,000 in recurring savings and local governments will realize a minimum of $700,000 in one-time savings and $550,000 in recurring savings from the inclusion of out-of-State claims in third-party medical claims review.
BILL DESCRIPTION
This bill makes various changes to the governance of the State Health Benefits program. The changes include:
· expanding the membership of the State Health Benefits Commission from five to 13 members;
· abolishing the State Health Benefits Plan Design Committee and transferring the powers and responsibilities of the committee to the State Health Benefits Commission;
· removing the super-conciliator process and replacing it with a binding arbitration process;
· requiring the commission to include claims reimbursed to providers located in another state as part of third-party medical claims review; and
· requiring the commission to establish an interactive, Internet-based price transparency dashboard that allows the commission, participating employers, and members to view the health care prices paid by the third-party administrator for health care services.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
None received.
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
The OLS finds that requiring the State Health Benefits Commission to establish an interactive, Internet-based price transparency dashboard that allows the commission, participating employers, and members to view the health care prices paid by the third-party administrator for health care services will result in one-time and recurring indeterminate State and local government expenditure increases stemming from third-party administrator fees and maintenance costs.
The State and local governments will also experience one-time and recurring annual expenditure decreases due to the inclusion of out-of-State claims in the third-party medical claims review contract. The current vendor, Health Management Systems, Inc., has suggested that the State will realize a minimum of $1.1 million in one-time savings and $870,000 in recurring savings, and local governments will realize a minimum of $700,000 in one-time savings and $550,000 in recurring savings from the inclusion of out-of-State claims in third-party medical claims review.
|
Section: |
State Government |
|
Analyst: |
Associate Fiscal Analyst |
|
Approved: |
Thomas Koenig Legislative Budget and Finance Officer |
This legislative fiscal estimate has been produced by the Office of Legislative Services due to the failure of the Executive Branch to respond to our request for a fiscal note.
This fiscal estimate has been prepared pursuant to P.L.1980, c.67 (C.52:13B-6 et seq.).