SENATE HEALTH, HUMAN SERVICES AND SENIOR CITIZENS COMMITTEE

 

STATEMENT TO

 

[Second Reprint]

SENATE, No. 2552

 

with committee amendments

 

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

 

DATED:  JUNE 6, 2024

 

      The Senate Health, Human Services and Senior Citizens Committee reports favorably and with committee amendments Senate Bill No. 2552 (2R).

      This bill amends the “County Option Hospital Fee Program Act,” P.L.2018, c.136 (C.30:4D-7r et seq.).  The County Option Hospital Fee Program was established in November 2018 to support local hospitals in designated high-need areas to ensure continued access to critical healthcare services for vulnerable populations.  To effectuate this goal, the program authorizes participating counties, and hospitals within those counties, to partner with the State through a provider fee mechanism that enhances financial support through the Medicaid program.

      As amended, the bill removes the existing requirement that the fee implemented under the program be subject to a cap as determined by the Commissioner of Human Services, and instead stipulates that the fee be subject to review and approval by the commissioner.  The bill also specifies that the fee is not to exceed the aggregate amount specified in 42 C.F.R. s.433.68(f)(3) minus one percent of total net patient revenues.  Current law requires that the fee is to be implemented in accordance with federal law.

      The amended bill provides that, if a participating county submits a proposed fee and expenditure report that includes plans to increase Medicaid or NJ FamilyCare payments for any hospital within its jurisdiction that exceeds the calculated value of its hospital-specific disproportionate share limit, the report is to include an attestation from that hospital’s chief executive officer confirming that the hospital is subject to a reduction in disproportionate share hospital payments.  The bill provides that any hospital that exceeds its hospital-specific disproportionate share limit as a result of payments received under the program or any other State or federal funding mechanisms or pools will be liable to the State for any funds the State may be required to reimburse the federal government.

      Under the bill, as amended, with the exception of the period of time during which a participating county or Medicaid Managed Care Organization is in possession of payments prior to disbursement, neither a participating county nor Medicaid Managed Care Organization is to be liable for any amount related to an approved expenditure plan determined to be impermissible by a federal agency. 

      The amended bill provides that the administrative provisions established by a board of County commissioners regarding the imposition of a hospital fee under the program may include the application of liens.

      As amended, the bill modifies the definition of a “participating county” under the program.  Under existing law, a county is deemed a “participating county” via two pathways.  This bill modifies a single component of one of these pathways, providing that a “participating county” means a county that contains a municipality with a population greater than 20,000, and with a Municipal Revitalization Index Distress score, as last calculated by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs prior to the effective date of P.L.2018, c.136 (C.30:4D-7r et seq.), that exceeds 55.  Under the current law, the Municipal Revitalization Index Distress score must exceed 60. 

 

COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS:

      The committee amendments modify the definition of “participating county” under the County Option Hospital Fee Program.  Under existing law, a county is deemed a “participating county” via two pathways.  These amendments modify a single component of one of these pathways, providing that a “participating county” means a county that contains a municipality with a population greater than 20,000, and with a Municipal Revitalization Index Distress score, as last calculated by the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs prior to the effective date of P.L.2018, c.136 (C.30:4D-7r et seq.), that exceeds 55.  Under the current law, the Municipal Revitalization Index Distress score must exceed 60.