LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE
[First Reprint]
SENATE, No. 1042
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
221st LEGISLATURE
DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2025
SUMMARY
|
Synopsis: |
"Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act"; establishes requirements, prohibitions, and programs for regulation of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). |
|
Type of Impact: |
Annual State expenditure and revenue increases. |
|
Agencies Affected: |
Department of Environmental Protection. |
|
Office of Legislative Services Estimate |
||||
|
Fiscal Impact |
FY 2027 |
FY 2028 |
Thereafter |
|
|
State Cost Increase |
Up to $5 million |
Indeterminate |
Indeterminate |
|
|
State Revenue Gain |
No impact |
No impact |
Indeterminate |
|
· The Office of Legislative Services (OLS) concludes that this bill would result in a State expenditure increase of up to $5.0 million in the first year of implementation and indeterminate cost increases thereafter for the Department of Environmental Protection to implement a PFAS source reduction program and conduct PFAS-related research, monitoring and testing.
· If the full $5.0 million appropriation is not expended in the first year, the residual amount will be spent in subsequent fiscal years until the full $5.0 million is exhausted.
· The OLS finds the department will incur annual costs to conduct enforcement activities and there will be State revenue increases from penalties collected for violations of the bill’s provisions. The OLS notes these increases are indeterminate because it cannot predict the frequency of violations nor the ensuing enforcement actions and penalty collections.
BILL DESCRIPTION
This bill would prohibit the sale of certain products containing intentionally added perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), establish a source reduction program concerning the proper management of PFAS, and appropriate money for the source reduction program and PFAS-related research. As defined in the bill, “PFAS” means substances that include any member of the class of fluorinated organic chemicals containing at least one fully fluorinated carbon atom.
The bill would require the Department of Environmental Protection to establish, no later than one year after the bill’s effective date, a source reduction program to reduce the presence of PFAS in the State’s air, water, and soil by encouraging the proper management of materials that contain PFAS and the use of safer alternatives. The bill would further require the department to conduct PFAS-related research and comprehensive monitoring and testing of the presence and impact of PFAS on the environmental media within the State, including air, water, biota, sediment, and soil. No later than two years after the bill’s effective date, and annually thereafter, the department would be required to submit a report to the Governor and the Legislature summarizing their research findings and activities and providing recommendations for programs, policies, and legislation to address the presence of PFAS in the State. Violations of the bill would be punishable by civil action, civil administrative penalty, and civil penalties, as enforced by the department.
Finally, the bill would appropriate $5.0 million to the department, including $2.5 million for implementing the source reduction program and $2.5 million for conducting PFAS-related research, monitoring, and testing. The department would annually request additional funds sufficient to conduct the air, water, and soil testing and PFAS-related research required under the act.
FISCAL ANALYSIS
EXECUTIVE BRANCH
None received.
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES
The OLS concludes that this bill would result in a State expenditure increase of up to $5.0 million in the first year of implementation and indeterminate cost increases thereafter for the Department of Environmental Protection to implement a PFAS source reduction program and conduct PFAS-related research, monitoring and testing. If the full $5.0 million appropriation is not expended in the first year, the residual amount will be spent in subsequent fiscal years until the full $5.0 million is exhausted.
The OLS finds the department will incur annual costs to conduct enforcement activities and there will be State revenue increases from penalties collected for violations of the bill’s provisions. The OLS notes these increases are indeterminate because it cannot predict the frequency of violations nor the ensuing enforcement actions and penalty collections.
As indicated in public testimony on the bill,
legislation in other states offers a reference point for the costs of
establishing a PFAS mitigation program. For reference only, the OLS notes that
fiscal analyses of Connecticut’s Senate Bill 292 of the 2024-2025 session and
Colorado’s House Bill 1345 of the 2022-2023 session, which was subsequently
signed into law, found that the respective bills would result in annual state
expenditure increases, including for additional staff.
|
Section: |
Environment, Agriculture, Energy, and Natural Resources |
|
Analyst: |
Anna Heckler Assistant Fiscal Analyst |
|
Approved: |
Thomas Koenig Legislative Budget and Finance Officer |
This legislative fiscal estimate has been produced by the Office of Legislative Services due to the failure of the Executive Branch to respond to our request for a fiscal note.
This fiscal estimate has been prepared pursuant to P.L.1980, c.67 (C.52:13B-6 et seq.).