ASSEMBLY COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE

STATEMENT TO

[First Reprint]

ASSEMBLY, No. 3495

STATE OF NEW JERSEY

DATED:  MAY 13, 2024

      The Assembly Commerce, Economic Development and Agriculture Committee reports favorably Assembly Bill No. 3495 (1R).

      This bill would supplement the “Franchise Practices Act,” P.L.1971, c.356 (C.56:10-1 et seq.) (Franchise Practices Act) to address hospitality franchises in which the franchisee is required to maintain a place of business within the State.  Under the bill, a franchise, as defined in 16 C.F.R. s.36 and 16 C.F.R. s.437, that is a hospitality franchise, will be considered “merchandise” under the consumer fraud act, P.L.1960, c.39 (C.56:8-1 et seq.).

      The bill defines “hospitality franchise” as a written arrangement for a definite or indefinite period, in which a person grants to another person a license to use a trade name, trade mark, service mark, or related characteristic, and in which there is a community of interest in the marketing of goods or services at wholesale, retail, by lease, agreement, or otherwise, where the goods include any hotel, motel, inn, tourist camp, tourist cabin, tourist home, rooming house or similar establishment where sleeping accommodations are supplied for pay to transient or permanent guests.

      The bill contains a list of hospitality franchisor activities that will be considered a violation of the Franchise Practices Act.  The bill makes it a violation for a hospitality franchisor to receive consideration, directly or indirectly, from a vendor or affiliate unless the consideration is:

      (1)  first disclosed to the franchisee or is disclosed in the franchise disclosure document; and

      (2)  unless the benefit is turned over to the franchisee or is placed into a dedicated expenditure fund that benefits the franchisee and the disbursements from the fund are approved by the Franchisee Advisory Committee.

      The bill makes it a violation for the hospitality franchisor to require a franchisee to purchase goods or services from suppliers designated by the franchisor if goods or services meeting the franchisor’s reasonable specifications and standards are available from other sources.  The bill also prohibits the franchisor from unreasonably refusing to license a trademark, trade name, or other identifying characteristics to a vendor or supplier who meets the franchisor’s reasonable specifications and standards for quality of goods, financial soundness and capacity to meet the business requirements of the franchise.  The bill ensures that the hospitality franchisor will not compete with the franchisee in an exclusive or protected territory under a different name or mark without the franchisee’s consent.

      The bill prohibits the practice of unilaterally changing the material terms of the franchise agreement by implementing changes in the operations manual.  This provision clarifies that the hospitality franchisor may not materially change the contract with the franchisee by altering the manual, unless the change involves material health, safety, and welfare protections for the franchisee’s guests or workforce.  The bill prohibits the franchisor from imposing any new fees on the franchisee unless the fees were disclosed in a franchise disclosure document, and unless approved by the franchisee advisory committee or agreed to, in writing, by the franchisee.  The bill makes it a violation for a hospitality franchisor to impose a fee or charge on the franchisee as the result of a franchisee’s failure to enroll a minimum number of guests.

      The bill prohibits a hospitality franchisor from selling points in a loyalty program directly to a guest to stay at a franchisee’s facility without compensating the franchisee for the stay.  The bill provides that the prohibition is not to be construed to restrict a franchisor’s ability to sell loyalty points to airlines or travel partners, financial institutions, credit card companies, or other third-party organizations offering loyalty points to consumers.

      Finally, the bill specifies that a violation of any of these provisions, or any of the provisions of section 7 of P.L.1971, c.356 (C.56:10-7), shall not constitute good cause for a franchisee’s termination.